2026 Impact & Benchmarking Survey

The measurable impact of SAA trainingon real school teams.

A 2026 benchmarking study of educators, administrators, and family partners shows how the School Avoidance Alliance framework reduces absenteeism, restores trust, and keeps students connected to school.

Impact Analysis

Out-of-District Placements Avoided

Verified Data

0.0%

Students Kept In-District

0.0× retained

Placed Out-of-District

0.0%

Retention Ratio

0.0×

Source · 2026 SAA Impact & Benchmarking Survey

Executive Overview

A clearer signal in the noise of attendance data.

This report distills survey responses from school teams trained by the School Avoidance Alliance into four practical shifts driving measurable student outcomes.

01

Earlier identification

Teams recognize the warning signs of school avoidance weeks — not semesters — before escalation.

02

Restorative response

Attendance letters and legal warnings give way to root-cause conversations and coordinated support.

03

Reintegration planning

Structured re-entry protocols replace ad-hoc case management, reducing out-of-district placements.

04

Family partnership

A shared language and process aligns families, educators, and clinicians around one plan.

Key Findings

Four numbers. One shift.

Outcomes reported by school teams after completing School Avoidance Alliance training.

2026 Impact Snapshot

Post-training outcome dashboard

Composite avg.

0.0%

  • High confidence after training

    Educators reporting confidence to lead an intervention

    0.0%

    Reported

  • Better early red-flag identification

    Teams catching warning signs earlier than before

    0.0%

    Reported

  • Adopting the framework

    Schools putting the protocol into daily practice

    0.0%

    Reported

  • Could be kept in-district

    Top

    Students supported without out-of-district placement

    0.0%

    Potential

n = school teams trained by the School Avoidance Alliance · 2026 Benchmarking Survey

Reported Potential
Why It Matters

Compliance won’t fix it. Connection will.

For decades, chronic absenteeism has been managed as a paperwork problem — logged, letter-sent, referred. The 2026 survey shows what actually moves the needle: teams trained to read the signals early and respond with structured, restorative support.

From

The compliance loop

A reactive posture designed to document absence, not resolve it.

  • Attendance letters

    Form notices sent home once thresholds are crossed — long after the child stopped feeling safe at school.

  • Legal warnings

    Truancy referrals and court letters that punish the symptom without touching the underlying cause.

  • Reactive escalation

    Crisis meetings triggered only after weeks of missed days, when options have already narrowed.

  • Case-by-case confusion

    Every family gets a different response depending on which staff member picks up the file.

To

The restorative response

A repeatable framework that treats avoidance as a solvable signal.

  • Early red-flag recognition

    Teams flag warning patterns in weeks — Sunday-night stomachaches, morning refusal, nurse visits — not semesters.

  • Root-cause identification

    Structured conversations surface anxiety, bullying, learning gaps, or transitions driving the avoidance.

  • Family partnership

    Families move from defensive to collaborative — one shared plan across home, school, and clinicians.

  • Reintegration planning

    Stepped, measurable re-entry protocols replace ad-hoc placements and out-of-district referrals.

The bottom line

Restorative practice pays off in weeks — not years.

Schools adopting the framework report earlier identification of at-risk students, fewer out-of-district placements, and a measurable rise in family trust — outcomes compliance-only programs consistently fail to produce.

80.8%

Adopting the framework

Confidence Shift

From uncertain to confident.

High-confidence ratings among school teams, before and after completing School Avoidance Alliance training.

Before training
0.0%

of teams felt highly confident before training.

After SAA training
0.0%

of teams report high confidence to lead an intervention.

A +61.5-point lift in team confidence
90.4%kept in-district
88.5%re-engaged
The Framework

Reactive becomes restorative.

A three-stage protocol schools use to shift from paperwork-driven attendance enforcement to coordinated student support.

01

Identify root causes

Move past attendance codes to what's actually driving avoidance — anxiety, learning gaps, family stressors, or unmet accommodations.

02

Reframe the response

Replace legal warnings and case-by-case improvisation with a shared clinical-informed protocol every team member can follow.

03

Build reintegration supports

Design structured re-entry plans with graduated exposure, school-safe supports, and family collaboration built in from day one.

71.1%
of trained school teams report they're already shifting from reactive to restorative practice.
Framework Adoption

80.8% are putting it to work.

School teams trained by the School Avoidance Alliance now apply the framework in practice.

Combined
0.0%
Adoption
Adoption breakdown

Four out of five trained teams are already applying the framework.

Fully integrating
Framework embedded in day-to-day team practice.
0.0%
Using as a supplement
Applied alongside existing attendance protocols.
0.0%
80.8%
Adopting
71.1%
Shifting to restorative
67.3%
High confidence

What teams are actually doing

Practices adopted by school teams after completing School Avoidance Alliance training.

Collaborative communication0.0%
Reframed language0.0%
Reintegration protocols0.0%
School-safe supports0.0%
Accommodations0.0%
Updated attendance communication0.0%

Source · 2026 SAA Impact & Benchmarking Survey

Student Impact

Fewer students lost. More students kept.

Student outcomes reported after teams completed School Avoidance Alliance training.

Outcome funnel
Progression across trained teams
% of respondents
Stage 01
Reported a student breakthrough
Meaningful progress observed by trained teams
0.0%
Stage 02
Re-engaged or back in the building
Students returned to consistent attendance
0.0%
Stage 03
Kept in their home district
Supported without out-of-district placement
0.0%
0%100%
In Their Words

What school teams shared.

Verbatim feedback from survey respondents after completing School Avoidance Alliance training.

The course and resources have been very helpful for our staff.
District Administrator
Verified survey respondent
Training was great. Very helpful.
School Counselor
Verified survey respondent
It helped us learn some new things as well.
Student Support Team
Verified survey respondent
Earlier identification and intervention is incredibly important.
Building Principal
Verified survey respondent
Jayne Demsky, Founder of School Avoidance Alliance
Jayne Demsky
Founder · School Avoidance Alliance
About the Founder

Bridging families, schools, and student-support teams

Jayne Demsky is the founder of the School Avoidance Allianceand a nationally recognized advocate helping families, schools, and clinicians better understand and respond to school avoidance.

Her work bridges the gap between families and school systems by helping teams respond with greater clarity, compassion, and practical structure — moving beyond confusion and compliance-based responses toward earlier identification and coordinated student support.

15+
Years in school avoidance advocacy
500+
Educators & clinicians trained
Nat'l
Speaker & media contributor
Areas of Focus
  • School avoidance training & professional development
  • Family–school collaboration
  • Practical intervention frameworks
  • Support for educators, administrators & student-support teams
Get the Benchmark ResultsTypically responds within 2 business days
Get the Benchmark Results

Explore what this could look like for your school or district.

If your team is navigating chronic absenteeism, school refusal, emotionally-based school avoidance, or inconsistent intervention protocols, a conversation with Jayne can help you identify the next practical step.

Clarify your team's current capacity and gaps
Map the framework to your existing protocols
Identify a practical next step for your context

Survey findings are presented in aggregate and do not identify individual respondents.